Executive StrategiesDocument Management Magazine

 

Review:

CommerceNet 99 Conference – The New Digital Economy

By Bruce Carothers

 
The San Diego waterfront was the backdrop for this year’s gathering of ecommerce vendors and customers, hosted by the CommerceNet trade association with some 500 member companies. CommerceNet conducts a wide range of research projects, runs interoperability labs, develops standards and policy, and promotes the ecommerce industry.  The conference was almost
entirely panel formats with lots of audience participation, much better than typical hour-long droning speakers with a thousand powerpoints. The CommerceNet 99 conference provided a forum to report results, discuss the current state of the market, and develop plans for the future.
 
What’s all the fuss about?
 
Amazon and eBay are among the current darlings of online consumer ecommerce, where individuals purchase everything from books to toys, flowers to computers, groceries to travel.   Even search portals are getting into the act – Yahoo users purchased over $100 million in goods last month from the new Yahoo shopping directory.  All told, online shoppers will spend over $20
billion this year in the US alone.
 
But in today’s e-speed Internet world, the online consumer market is already considered the minor leagues in some circles.  In fact one speaker referred to business-to-consumer markets as the “practice game” before the real event.  The numbers support this dismissive attitude, and they are
staggering.
 
Business-to-business ecommerce is projected to rocket from $43 billion in 1998 to more than $1 trillion by 2003, according to Forrester, with other analysts making similar forecasts.  During the same period, the consumer market will grow from a “mere” $7.8 billion to just over $100 billion.   The net net: online business commerce will exceed online consumer shopping by more than 10-fold in just a few years.  And while the land grab for consumer sites is well underway (and some would say already saturated), the opportunity for B2B markets is just emerging.
 
Document Management and eCommerce
 
So how is all this B2B ecommerce actually conducted?  Through the transfer of business documents such as product data sheets, RFQ/RFPs, purchase orders, invoices, shipping manifests – all the documents that we in the Document Management industry have been scanning or indexing through various library systems and routing through workflows.   Now businesses are starting to realize that the real value of these documents and the processes around them comes not just from internal capture and management (been there, done that).  Instead the real value comes from exchanging these documents with customers and business partners in order to conduct business over the net.
 
Document management professionals often have deep experience with the properties and processing of these core business documents, which can add real value to project teams charged with deploying ecommerce systems.   IT professionals that know the internal electronic document systems can ensure that external business transactions correctly integrate with internal corporate systems.  Several recent industry reports have highlighted the problems of some 1st-generation ecommerce systems which collect orders electronically over the net, but still rely on printed documents being keyed into order entry systems.   A strong document management or workflow expert would have blown the whistle early on.
 
We all know documents are the currency of business.  Real world experience gained from automating the internal document processing can provide a rationale for getting on that hot new ecommerce project down the hall.  So get smart about ebusiness models and technology, learn about how your customers and trading partners interact with your company, and jump on the
ecommerce ride!
 
The Evolution of Document Exchange Standards
 
B2B commerce has traditionally been conducted through EDI transactions.  But EDI failed to gain wide use except in very controlled and relatively stable trading communities such as automotive and government / aerospace industries.  In general, EDI has been too complex and too expensive for small to medium businesses to adopt.  A vendor recently suggested, “EDI is like clothing in the 70s.  It seemed like a good idea at the time, but we’re glad all that’s over”.  Now everyone wants to conduct business over the Internet, not through proprietary EDI networks.
 
In the new ecommerce markets, XML has become the technical standard for exchanging documents and data about those documents through tags.  However, while XML provides a great mechanism to define and exchange information over the net, trading partners still have to agree on the semantics.  What you call Item Number, I might call Part Number and another vendor might call
SKU.  Are they the same data item or different?  A related issue is the actual document definition.  This might be described in a Document Type Definition (DTD) or a document schema.  But if your layout for a purchase order is different from my layout of a purchase order, we can’t do much
ecommerce.
 
This has resulted in a series of XML variants and vertical industry definition standards such as Commerce XML (Ariba), Common Business Library (CommerceOne), Open Buying on the Internet (OBI), Biztalk (Microsoft), Information Content and Exchange (Vignette), RosettaNET and others.   Not to be outdone, the CommerceNet association launched their own ecommerce
interoperability standard called the Ecommerce Framework.
 
To be fair, not all of these standards are conflicting and some are complimentary.  For example, OBI is focused on buy/sell procurement transactions while RosettaNet is focused on managing parts in the supply chain.  However, many of these standards are just emerging and have not been
widely adopted yet.  In fact, once you get under the covers with many vendors their current product offering is based on customized XML formats with unique point solutions for each vendor interface and “connectors” for each standard.  It works, but it’s not pretty.
 
An OBI showcase was setup and running at the conference, with interoperable ecommerce systems from barnesandnoble.com, Concur, EPIC, Office Depot, and SupplyWorks freely searching each other’s product catalogs and exchanging buy/sell transactions.  The level of interoperability was impressive, but more than a few of the cross-system transactions were in fact XML point
solution interfaces written specifically for a given vendor’s package.
 
Customers and vendors alike recognize that the market opportunity for interoperable trading communities is too huge to address with point-to-point solutions, but it will take time for vendors to implement these just-emerging standards and for the standards themselves to sort out.
 
B2B eCommerce Market Overview
 
While the B2B ecommerce market is making dramatic changes almost daily, the universe can be broadly defined by three key segments.
 
eCommerce Makers – These are the vendors that provide the infrastructure, application products and delivery services required to conduct ecommerce. Firms like Ariba and CommerceOne are leaders in licensed eBiz applications, typically for online procurement (they also operate online trading markets where any business can purchase goods online).  Other vendors like Trilogy
and Vignette provide the core ecommerce server applications that companies use to setup their ecommerce system.  And vendors like Sapient and Viant provide the critical systems design and integration services to actually implement all this great technology.
 
eCommerce Merchants – These are the “bricks and mortar” and dot.com companies that use the technology provided by eCommerce enablers to sell their products over the net.  Leading IT vendors like Cisco and Dell are already driving billions in annual revenue through their web sites.  Other business commerce sites include everyone from horizontal vendors like Officedepot.com to the thousands of niche suppliers for pumps, electronic components, manufacturing supplies, etc within a vertical industry.  You can only purchase product from a single vendor at these merchant sites.
 
eCommerce Markets – This is where all the action is.  Rather than go direct to a vendor site to purchase a widget, business buyers and sellers are flocking to new eMarket hubs, where buyers can compare competing widgets from multiple vendors.  These are the eBay sites for business.  Companies such as Chemdex (chemical products), e-Steel (steel products), Healtheon (medical products and services), and VerticalNet (collection of 50 vertical market hubs) have created a virtual community around horizontal or vertical market segments.  Because of the “network effect” that takes place when a critical mass of buyers and sellers get together, these eMarket hubs will
drive and control the majority of B2B online transactions.
 
So what’s it cost to do business on the Web?  Gartner recently reported that the average ecommerce site cost more than $1 million, and is expected to increase by 25% each year.  The Gartner survey also reported that the average time to complete an ecommerce site was about 6 months.  Three
ecommerce investment categories were suggested: less than $1 million to “get on the map”, $1 - $5 million to “run with the pack” and $5 - $20 million to be a “market leader”.  These numbers don’t include marketing and advertising costs, which often exceed the site development costs.

Banner Ads Are Losing Ground
 
Banner ads are those annoying, flashing advertisements that crowd around the real content you want to see on your favorite web page.  Apparently the response rate or click-through rate is less than half of one percent of all page views, considerably less than the anemic 2% - 4% response rate for direct mail.  Despite this dismal and declining response rate, companies have invested hundreds of millions of dollars for multi-year ad placement contracts with the major search engines. Apparently, some of these firms are asking for their money back or more creative ways to showcase their wares.

So these major portal sites are moving toward online shopping directories, advertorial placements, product reviews and much more narrowly targeted banner ads.  Basically anything to wrap content around the ad will improve the consumer value and selling effectiveness.

Privacy vs Personalization
 
One of the more interesting panel discussions centered around the tradeoffs between privacy and personalization.  The recent outrage that erupted against RealNetworks served to underline concerns in this area. (RealNetworks media player collects data on what songs you download and
listen to, and then secretly transmits this back to the vendor).  On the one hand, consumers and businesses both benefit from personalization.  If you go to Amazon, it can suggest books you might enjoy based on previous buying. If you call a vendor to reorder supplies, they can just renew your previous order configuration.  One panelist even suggested that we may soon see personalized coupons downloaded to our PDA or phone device when we enter a retail store, based on our buying habits and interests (that’s real 1:1 marketing!).   On the other hand, this personalization and convenience only comes by providing personal data.  And of course this data can be resold and
abused in many ways.  We’ve all been pestered by telemarketers and spam email from companies that bought our identity and consumer profile.

 The panel seemed to agree on two positions:
businesses are much less sensitive to privacy issues than consumers when it comes to web commerce.
consumers should always be asked for permission by the retailer before their data is used for a “secondary” purpose, i.e. provided to another vendor.

eCommerce Cultural Barriers

As with large document management and ERP projects, implementing eCommerce systems can have a profound impact on corporate culture.  After all, who owns eCommerce?  Marketing, IT, Customer Service, Business Development, cross-functional project teams, even the CEO are common answers.  One speaker discussed painful internal turf wars and power struggles for the
leadership role.  Apparently the Chairman of the company declared that he was in charge of the ecommerce initiative and anyone that didn’t recognize that would be gone in 30 days.

eCommerce systems require a fundamental rethinking of the business fundamentals.  How will existing distribution channels be impacted by direct sales over the Web?  How will customer service track online orders?  How will existing legacy systems be integrated?  What about linking supply vendors?  All these issues cut across many functional boundaries, making any single department the owner of ecommerce a poor idea.  The panelists seem to agree that the preferred organizational scheme was a cross-functional project team reporting directly to the CEO, who serves as the ecommerce champion.

Do Fish Drink Water?

Another conference highlight was a presentation by the chief Xerox Web Master, whose job it is to answer all corporate email.  Apparently Xerox considers this good customer service (imagine that!) and they even respond to emails from non-customers.  Over the years, they have researched and
answered questions such as: Why is the sky blue?  Do blind people see in their dreams?  What is the difference between partly cloudy and partly sunny?  What is the book held by the Statue of Liberty?  Apparently, they answer over 100,000 such emails each year.  The most interesting ones have been published in a book called Do Fish Drink Water?  Very entertaining.

Resources
 
For information on the CommerceNet industry group, visit www.commercenet.com
For information on the new Ecommerce Interoperability Framework, visit eco.commerce.net.
For information on the OBI standard, visit www.openbuy.org
For information on Biztalk, visit www.biztalk.org
For information on RosettaNet, visit www.rosettanet.org
 
About the Author
 
Bruce Carothers is an eBusiness consultant, helping companies plan and implement their eBusiness strategy.  He is the founder and former CEO of Motiva Software, an eChange solution for product design teams.  He can be reached at bruce_carothers@email.msn.com.